Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Place in performance ranking	309	785
Place by popularity	7	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.89	0.07
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	N17P-G1	Opal
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	25 October 2016 (7 years ago)	9 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	no data
Current price	$207 (1.5x MSRP)	$324

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 Ti has 8314% better value for money than R7 A265.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	384
CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	1291 MHz	725 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	825 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	66.82	19.80
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops	633.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.36
+537%

R7 A265 2.57

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti outperforms Radeon R7 A265 by 537% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 Ti 6317
+536%

R7 A265 993

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti outperforms Radeon R7 A265 by 536% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	53 +563%	8−9 −563%
1440p	30 +650%	4−5 −650%
4K	27 +575%	4−5 −575%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

160−170

+515%

24−27
−515%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	300−310 +525%	48 −525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	170−180 +530%	27−30 −530%
Battlefield 5	300−310 +466%	53 −466%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	210−220 +536%	30−35 −536%
Cyberpunk 2077	160−170 +515%	24−27 −515%
Far Cry 5	240−250 +532%	35−40 −532%
Far Cry New Dawn	280−290 +536%	40−45 −536%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +480%	69 −480%
Hitman 3	200−210 +525%	30−35 −525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	400−450 +515%	65−70 −515%
Metro Exodus	350−400 +525%	56 −525%
Red Dead Redemption 2	280−290 +522%	45−50 −522%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	400−450 +497%	67 −497%
Watch Dogs: Legion	300−310 +477%	50−55 −477%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	250−260 +525%	40 −525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	170−180 +530%	27−30 −530%
Battlefield 5	280−290 +536%	44 −536%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	210−220 +536%	30−35 −536%
Cyberpunk 2077	160−170 +515%	24−27 −515%
Far Cry 5	220−230 +529%	35 −529%
Far Cry New Dawn	260−270 +534%	41 −534%
Forza Horizon 4	450−500 +484%	75−80 −484%
Hitman 3	200−210 +525%	30−35 −525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	400−450 +515%	65−70 −515%
Metro Exodus	280−290 +522%	45 −522%
Red Dead Redemption 2	280−290 +522%	45−50 −522%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 +500%	50 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	300−310 +512%	49 −512%
Watch Dogs: Legion	300−310 +477%	50−55 −477%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +525%	24 −525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	170−180 +530%	27−30 −530%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	210−220 +536%	30−35 −536%
Cyberpunk 2077	160−170 +515%	24−27 −515%
Far Cry 5	170−180 +530%	27 −530%
Forza Horizon 4	280−290 +522%	45 −522%
Horizon Zero Dawn	280−290 +522%	45 −522%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	270−280 +528%	43 −528%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 +515%	26 −515%
Watch Dogs: Legion	300−310 +477%	50−55 −477%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

280−290

+522%

45−50
−522%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	200−210 +525%	30−35 −525%
Far Cry New Dawn	180−190 +521%	29 −521%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−105 +488%	16−18 −488%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +507%	14−16 −507%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +500%	20−22 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +511%	9−10 −511%
Far Cry 5	170−180 +530%	27−30 −530%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +513%	30−35 −513%
Hitman 3	120−130 +532%	18−20 −532%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 +525%	32 −525%
Metro Exodus	180−190 +521%	29 −521%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	190−200 +533%	30 −533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +511%	18−20 −511%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +500%	10−11 −500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

170−180

+530%

27−30
−530%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−105 +525%	16−18 −525%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +525%	12−14 −525%
Hitman 3	75−80 +525%	12−14 −525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +511%	18−20 −511%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +500%	10−11 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 +525%	16−18 −525%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +511%	9−10 −511%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +525%	8−9 −525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +525%	8−9 −525%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +511%	9−10 −511%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +500%	20 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +511%	18 −511%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +507%	14 −507%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +483%	6−7 −483%