Radeon RX 6500 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and Radeon RX 6500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 6500 outperforms 1050 Ti Mobile by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 405 | 335 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 14.23 | no data |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | no data |
| GPU code name | GP107 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 3 January 2017 (8 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,300 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | no data |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.488 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | no data |
| TMUs | 48 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Ansel | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 56
−25%
| 70−75
+25%
|
| 1440p | 25
−20%
| 30−35
+20%
|
| 4K | 17
−23.5%
| 21−24
+23.5%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 59
−32.2%
|
75−80
+32.2%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 57
−29.8%
|
70−75
+29.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 47
−27.7%
|
60−65
+27.7%
|
| Fortnite | 80−85
−23.8%
|
95−100
+23.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 62
−21%
|
75−80
+21%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 56
−25%
|
70−75
+25%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 49
−59.2%
|
75−80
+59.2%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 124
−83.1%
|
220−230
+83.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 92
−16.3%
|
100−110
+16.3%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 45
−64.4%
|
70−75
+64.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 44
−36.4%
|
60−65
+36.4%
|
| Fortnite | 76
−30.3%
|
95−100
+30.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 57
−31.6%
|
75−80
+31.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55
−25.5%
|
65−70
+25.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 19
−111%
|
40−45
+111%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 52
−34.6%
|
70−75
+34.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 47
−8.5%
|
50−55
+8.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 42
−85.7%
|
75−80
+85.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 86
−24.4%
|
100−110
+24.4%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 41
−80.5%
|
70−75
+80.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40
−50%
|
60−65
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 43
−74.4%
|
75−80
+74.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 39
−79.5%
|
70−75
+79.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 26
−96.2%
|
50−55
+96.2%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 54
−83.3%
|
95−100
+83.3%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
−28.6%
|
130−140
+28.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−45.5%
|
30−35
+45.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12
−100%
|
24−27
+100%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 29
−82.8%
|
50−55
+82.8%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 26
−53.8%
|
40−45
+53.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 26
−57.7%
|
40−45
+57.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−35.3%
|
45−50
+35.3%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 32
−34.4%
|
40−45
+34.4%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
−30.8%
|
30−35
+30.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7
−114%
|
14−16
+114%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 17
−58.8%
|
27−30
+58.8%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−40%
|
27−30
+40%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
−25.5%
|
60−65
+25.5%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 7
−157%
|
18−20
+157%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12
−75%
|
21−24
+75%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−33.3%
|
30−35
+33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 9
−111%
|
18−20
+111%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Valorant | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
4K
High
| Valorant | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and RX 6500 compete in popular games:
- RX 6500 is 25% faster in 1080p
- RX 6500 is 20% faster in 1440p
- RX 6500 is 24% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Escape from Tarkov, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6500 is 157% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 6500 performs better in 43 tests (88%)
- there's a draw in 6 tests (12%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
