RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.
PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms 1050 Ti Mobile by a whopping 417% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 399 | 20 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 14.11 | 78.13 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | GP107 | GB203 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 January 2017 (8 years ago) | 11 August 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 8960 |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 790 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1337 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,300 million | 45,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 | 374.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.488 TFLOPS | 23.96 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 96 |
| TMUs | 48 | 280 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 280 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 70 |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 8.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 48 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 167 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Ansel | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.4 |
| CUDA | + | 12.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 56
−400%
| 280−290
+400%
|
| 1440p | 25
−380%
| 120−130
+380%
|
| 4K | 17
−400%
| 85−90
+400%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 59
−408%
|
300−310
+408%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 47
−411%
|
240−250
+411%
|
| Fortnite | 80−85
−400%
|
400−450
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 62
−384%
|
300−310
+384%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 56
−400%
|
280−290
+400%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 49
−410%
|
250−260
+410%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 124
−384%
|
600−650
+384%
|
| Dota 2 | 92
−389%
|
450−500
+389%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 44
−400%
|
220−230
+400%
|
| Fortnite | 76
−361%
|
350−400
+361%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 57
−409%
|
290−300
+409%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55
−409%
|
280−290
+409%
|
| Metro Exodus | 19
−400%
|
95−100
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 52
−400%
|
260−270
+400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 47
−411%
|
240−250
+411%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 42
−400%
|
210−220
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 86
−365%
|
400−450
+365%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40
−400%
|
200−210
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 43
−412%
|
220−230
+412%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 39
−413%
|
200−210
+413%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 26
−400%
|
130−140
+400%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 54
−400%
|
270−280
+400%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
−376%
|
500−550
+376%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−400%
|
110−120
+400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12
−400%
|
60−65
+400%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 29
−383%
|
140−150
+383%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 26
−400%
|
130−140
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−400%
|
170−180
+400%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 32
−400%
|
160−170
+400%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
−400%
|
130−140
+400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7
−400%
|
35−40
+400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 17
−400%
|
85−90
+400%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−400%
|
100−105
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
−410%
|
260−270
+410%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12
−400%
|
60−65
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−400%
|
120−130
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−400%
|
70−75
+400%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 9
−400%
|
45−50
+400%
|
This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF compete in popular games:
- RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 400% faster in 1080p
- RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 380% faster in 1440p
- RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 400% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.14 | 67.89 |
| Recency | 3 January 2017 | 11 August 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 70 Watt |
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has a 416.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
