Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
15.30
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.31
+78.5%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking348202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.9753.44
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP107AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed1493 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.76129.6
Floating-point processing power2.488 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 15.30
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.31
+78.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 9616
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+110%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 30690
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+116%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7741
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+82.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
−69.6%
95−100
+69.6%
1440p25
−60%
40−45
+60%
4K17
−76.5%
30−35
+76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
−74.4%
75−80
+74.4%
Battlefield 5 59
−69.5%
100−105
+69.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
−70.2%
80−85
+70.2%
Far Cry 5 47
−70.2%
80−85
+70.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 46
−73.9%
80−85
+73.9%
Forza Horizon 4 62
−77.4%
110−120
+77.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
−75.7%
65−70
+75.7%
Battlefield 5 49
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 44
−70.5%
75−80
+70.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
−66.7%
70−75
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 57
−75.4%
100−105
+75.4%
Metro Exodus 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−66.7%
70−75
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
−70.2%
80−85
+70.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 23
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%
Battlefield 5 42
−66.7%
70−75
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 40
−75%
70−75
+75%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−71.1%
65−70
+71.1%
Forza Horizon 4 43
−74.4%
75−80
+74.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Battlefield 5 29
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Far Cry 5 26
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−75%
140−150
+75%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4
−75%
7−8
+75%
Metro Exodus 7
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
−75%
14−16
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Far Cry 5 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 70% faster in 1080p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 60% faster in 1440p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 76% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.30 27.31
Recency 3 January 2017 26 February 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 78.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 844 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.