FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile with FirePro M6000, including specs and performance data.
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile outperforms FirePro M6000 by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 331 | 620 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN (2011−2017) |
GPU code name | GP107 | Heathrow |
Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 (7 years ago) | 1 July 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 750 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 3,300 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 43 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 77.76 | 32.00 |
Floating-point performance | no data | 1,024 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and FirePro M6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 180−190
+210%
| 58
−210%
|
Full HD | 56
+19.1%
| 47
−19.1%
|
1440p | 25
+257%
| 7−8
−257%
|
4K | 17
+240%
| 5−6
−240%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 43
+231%
|
12−14
−231%
|
Battlefield 5 | 59
+392%
|
12−14
−392%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 47
+370%
|
10−11
−370%
|
Far Cry 5 | 47
+370%
|
10−11
−370%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 46
+254%
|
12−14
−254%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 62
+114%
|
27−30
−114%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 33
+175%
|
12−14
−175%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 39
+129%
|
16−18
−129%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 37
+185%
|
12−14
−185%
|
Battlefield 5 | 49
+308%
|
12−14
−308%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 33
+230%
|
10−11
−230%
|
Far Cry 5 | 44
+340%
|
10−11
−340%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 42
+223%
|
12−14
−223%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 57
+96.6%
|
27−30
−96.6%
|
Metro Exodus | 19
+72.7%
|
10−12
−72.7%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+250%
|
12−14
−250%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 33
+94.1%
|
16−18
−94.1%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 47
+176%
|
16−18
−176%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 23
+76.9%
|
12−14
−76.9%
|
Battlefield 5 | 42
+250%
|
12−14
−250%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40
+300%
|
10−11
−300%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 38
+280%
|
10−11
−280%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 43
+48.3%
|
27−30
−48.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 26
+52.9%
|
16−18
−52.9%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21
+250%
|
6−7
−250%
|
Metro Exodus | 12
+300%
|
3−4
−300%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+257%
|
7−8
−257%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 17
+240%
|
5−6
−240%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
+275%
|
4−5
−275%
|
Battlefield 5 | 29
+263%
|
8−9
−263%
|
Far Cry 5 | 26
+420%
|
5−6
−420%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
+789%
|
9−10
−789%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Metro Exodus | 7
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+250%
|
4−5
−250%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 17
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+275%
|
4−5
−275%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 13
+225%
|
4−5
−225%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+425%
|
4−5
−425%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and FirePro M6000 compete in popular games:
- GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 210% faster in 900p
- GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 19% faster in 1080p
- GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 257% faster in 1440p
- GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 240% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 1600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 30 tests (44%)
- there's a draw in 38 tests (56%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 15.34 | 4.72 |
Recency | 3 January 2017 | 1 July 2012 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 43 Watt |
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has a 225% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
FirePro M6000, on the other hand, has 74.4% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M6000 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M6000 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.