Radeon RX 6850M XT vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and Radeon RX 6850M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
13.90

RX 6850M XT outperforms GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking37377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.7918.89
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP107Navi 22
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2018 (7 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560
Core clock speed1152 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speed1417 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate68.02413.0
Floating-point processing power2.177 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs48160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 13.90
RX 6850M XT 45.17
+225%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 5343
RX 6850M XT 17369
+225%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 8752
RX 6850M XT 42016
+380%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 7324
RX 6850M XT 33901
+363%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 46952
RX 6850M XT 172972
+268%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 2261
RX 6850M XT 11837
+424%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
−148%
139
+148%
1440p19
−358%
87
+358%
4K20
−235%
67
+235%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−292%
95−100
+292%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−493%
160
+493%
Elden Ring 40−45
−112%
89
+112%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 41
−171%
110−120
+171%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−292%
95−100
+292%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−152%
68
+152%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−430%
297
+430%
Metro Exodus 49
−112%
100−110
+112%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−153%
85−90
+153%
Valorant 55−60
−235%
180−190
+235%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45
−147%
110−120
+147%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−292%
95−100
+292%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−96.3%
53
+96.3%
Dota 2 71
−71.8%
122
+71.8%
Elden Ring 40−45
−286%
160−170
+286%
Far Cry 5 69
+56.8%
44
−56.8%
Fortnite 75−80
−142%
180−190
+142%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−363%
259
+363%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
−121%
126
+121%
Metro Exodus 34
−26.5%
43
+26.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 141
−48.9%
210−220
+48.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−153%
85−90
+153%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−293%
160−170
+293%
Valorant 55−60
−235%
180−190
+235%
World of Tanks 180−190
−51.6%
270−280
+51.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 36
−208%
110−120
+208%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−292%
95−100
+292%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−63%
44
+63%
Dota 2 94
−1.1%
95
+1.1%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−98.1%
100−110
+98.1%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−305%
227
+305%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−108%
210−220
+108%
Valorant 55−60
−235%
180−190
+235%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 20−22
−345%
89
+345%
Elden Ring 21−24
−362%
95−100
+362%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−345%
89
+345%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−54.9%
170−180
+54.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−292%
45−50
+292%
World of Tanks 95−100
−192%
280−290
+192%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−182%
75−80
+182%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−308%
45−50
+308%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−180%
28
+180%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−339%
140−150
+339%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−403%
166
+403%
Metro Exodus 29
−228%
95−100
+228%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−388%
80−85
+388%
Valorant 30−35
−344%
150−160
+344%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−444%
45−50
+444%
Dota 2 36
−175%
99
+175%
Elden Ring 9−10
−422%
45−50
+422%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
−175%
99
+175%
Metro Exodus 5
−680%
35−40
+680%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 42
−257%
150−160
+257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
−175%
99
+175%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 11
−391%
50−55
+391%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−444%
45−50
+444%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−225%
13
+225%
Dota 2 46
−69.6%
78
+69.6%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−318%
70−75
+318%
Fortnite 16−18
−325%
65−70
+325%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−384%
92
+384%
Valorant 14−16
−447%
80−85
+447%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and RX 6850M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6850M XT is 148% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6850M XT is 358% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6850M XT is 235% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 57% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6850M XT is 680% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • RX 6850M XT is ahead in 62 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.90 45.17
Recency 3 January 2018 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 165 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q has 120% lower power consumption.

RX 6850M XT, on the other hand, has a 225% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6850M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
Radeon RX 6850M XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 106 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 230 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6850M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.