Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	403	293
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.53	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N17P-G0 Max-Q	N19P-Q1
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	3 January 2018 (6 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	$1085	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	768
Core clock speed	999 - 1189 MHz	795 / 1230 MHz
Boost clock speed	1139 - 1328 MHz	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	34 - 40 Watt	35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rate	53.12	75.60
Floating-point performance	1,700 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and Quadro T1000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 10.50

T1000 Max-Q 17.38
+65.5%

Quadro T1000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q by 66% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 Max-Q 4059

T1000 Max-Q 6721
+65.6%

Quadro T1000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q by 66% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	49 −63.3%	80−85 +63.3%
1440p	22 −59.1%	35−40 +59.1%
4K	16 −50%	24−27 +50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−68.8%

27−30
+68.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −72.7%	55−60 +72.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	31 −22.6%	35−40 +22.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Far Cry 5	37 −24.3%	45−50 +24.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −65.5%	45−50 +65.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −58.3%	55−60 +58.3%
Hitman 3	24−27 −70.8%	40−45 +70.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −60%	55−60 +60%
Metro Exodus	44 −18.2%	50−55 +18.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 −9.1%	45−50 +9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −69%	45−50 +69%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −77.8%	30−35 +77.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 −12.9%	35−40 +12.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −72.7%	55−60 +72.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	29 −31%	35−40 +31%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Far Cry 5	65 +41.3%	45−50 −41.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	19 −153%	45−50 +153%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −58.3%	55−60 +58.3%
Hitman 3	24−27 −70.8%	40−45 +70.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −60%	55−60 +60%
Metro Exodus	37 −40.5%	50−55 +40.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	36 −33.3%	45−50 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	11 −345%	45−50 +345%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 −5.7%	35−40 +5.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −77.8%	30−35 +77.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16 −119%	35−40 +119%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	19 −100%	35−40 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Far Cry 5	22 −109%	45−50 +109%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −58.3%	55−60 +58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −60%	55−60 +60%
Metro Exodus	34 −52.9%	50−55 +52.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21 −76.2%	35−40 +76.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −77.8%	30−35 +77.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−54.8%

45−50
+54.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −61.9%	30−35 +61.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	25 −32%	30−35 +32%
Hitman 3	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10 −80%	18−20 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −150%	14−16 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12 −83.3%	21−24 +83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Far Cry 5	22 −31.8%	27−30 +31.8%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −73.7%	30−35 +73.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −59.1%	35−40 +59.1%
Metro Exodus	24 −33.3%	30−35 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −143%	30−35 +143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −90%	18−20 +90%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	30 −20%	35−40 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	13 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Hitman 3	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −72.7%	18−20 +72.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −30.8%	16−18 +30.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −76.9%	21−24 +76.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −72.7%	18−20 +72.7%
Metro Exodus	12 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−50%

14−16
+50%

This is how GTX 1050 Max-Q and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

T1000 Max-Q is 63% faster in 1080p
T1000 Max-Q is 59% faster in 1440p
T1000 Max-Q is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Max-Q is 41% faster than the T1000 Max-Q.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 345% faster than the GTX 1050 Max-Q.

All in all, in popular games: