ATI Radeon X1650 SE vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking393not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameno dataRV515
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateApril 2018 (6 years ago)2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed1366 MHz635 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data107 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data27 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.540
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount3 MB512 MB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth84 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Multi-Projection+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 3 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile has a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1650 SE, on the other hand, has a 16966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile and Radeon X1650 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon X1650 SE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
ATI Radeon X1650 SE
Radeon X1650 SE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 106 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1650 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.