Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile

VS
Radeon Pro 450 Radeon Pro 455 Radeon Pro 460 Radeon Pro WX 4130 Radeon Pro WX 4150 Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile with Radeon Pro WX 4150, including specs and performance data.

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
2018
3 MB GDDR5
10.70
+76.9%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile outperforms Pro WX 4150 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile GTX 1050 3GB
Pro WX 4150 Pro WX 4150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking411567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.63
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameno dataBaffin
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release dateApril 2018 (6 years ago)1 March 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768896
Core clock speed1366 MHz1002 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHz1053 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data58.97
Floating-point processing powerno data1.887 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 MB4 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth84 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
Multi-Projection+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan+1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.70 6.05
Maximum RAM amount 3 MB 4 GB

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile has a 76.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro WX 4150, on the other hand, has a 136433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
vs
R9 M395 Radeon R9 M395
Pro WX 4150 Radeon Pro WX 4150
vs
Quadro M620 Quadro M620
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
vs
RX 5300M Radeon RX 5300M
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
HD Graphics 405 HD Graphics 405
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
HD 8330 HD 8330
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RX 580 2048SP RX 580 2048SP
RTX 3070 16 GB GeForce RTX 3070 16 GB
vs
RX 7900 GRE RX 7900 GRE
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
vs
Tesla P10 Tesla P10
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
RTX 3080 Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
vs
Arc A770 Arc A770
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
7800 GT GeForce 7800 GT
RTX 3090 GeForce RTX 3090
vs
H100 SXM5 64 GB SXM5 64 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 125 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 21 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile or Radeon Pro WX 4150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.