UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.

GTS 450 Rev. 2
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 106 Watt
4.39

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms GTS 450 Rev. 2 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking630624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.10
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGF116Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 March 2011 (13 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Current priceno data$1454

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192256
Core clock speed783 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate25.0620.80
Floating-point performance601.3 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and UHD Graphics 750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed3608 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth57.73 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.1no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Hitman 3 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Hitman 3 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Hitman 3 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hitman 3 0−1 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.39 4.49
Recency 15 March 2011 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 15 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and UHD Graphics 750.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 750 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 39 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 357 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.