Radeon RX 6950 XT vs GeForce GTS 250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTS 250
2009
1 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
1.55

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms GeForce GTS 250 by a whopping 4626% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking92913
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0522.69
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameG92BNavi
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 March 2009 (15 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $1,099
Current price$131 (0.7x MSRP)$961 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6950 XT has 45280% better value for money than GTS 250.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1285120
CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed738 MHz1925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2324 MHz
Number of transistors754 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt335 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate47.2 billion/sec743.7
Floating-point performance387.1 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm)267 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.04.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 250 1.55
RX 6950 XT 73.26
+4626%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms GeForce GTS 250 by 4626% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTS 250 598
RX 6950 XT 28295
+4632%

Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms GeForce GTS 250 by 4632% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−5250%
214
+5250%
1440p2−3
−6650%
135
+6650%
4K1−2
−8500%
86
+8500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 161
−4620%
7600−7650
+4620%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−4598%
5450−5500
+4598%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
−4590%
6050−6100
+4590%
Battlefield 5 230−240
−4623%
11100−11150
+4623%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−4608%
5650−5700
+4608%
Cyberpunk 2077 143
−4620%
6750−6800
+4620%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−4603%
5550−5600
+4603%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
−4624%
8550−8600
+4624%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−4612%
10650−10700
+4612%
Hitman 3 120−130
−4615%
5800−5850
+4615%
Horizon Zero Dawn 450
−4622%
21250−21300
+4622%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−4624%
6850−6900
+4624%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−4618%
5850−5900
+4618%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 500
−4620%
23600−23650
+4620%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130
−4592%
6100−6150
+4592%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−4598%
5450−5500
+4598%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
−4590%
6050−6100
+4590%
Battlefield 5 230−240
−4623%
11100−11150
+4623%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−4608%
5650−5700
+4608%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
−4588%
6000−6050
+4588%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−4603%
5550−5600
+4603%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
−4624%
8550−8600
+4624%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−4612%
10650−10700
+4612%
Hitman 3 120−130
−4615%
5800−5850
+4615%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
−4626%
14650−14700
+4626%
Metro Exodus 74
−4562%
3450−3500
+4562%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−4618%
5850−5900
+4618%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 442
−4617%
20850−20900
+4617%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 376
−4621%
17750−17800
+4621%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−4610%
6500−6550
+4610%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−4598%
5450−5500
+4598%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
−4590%
6050−6100
+4590%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−4608%
5650−5700
+4608%
Cyberpunk 2077 122
−4613%
5750−5800
+4613%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−4603%
5550−5600
+4603%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−4612%
10650−10700
+4612%
Horizon Zero Dawn 318
−4617%
15000−15050
+4617%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 396
−4622%
18700−18750
+4622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 216
−4622%
10200−10250
+4622%
Watch Dogs: Legion 107
−4620%
5050−5100
+4620%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−4618%
5850−5900
+4618%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
−4599%
7800−7850
+4599%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−4622%
6800−6850
+4622%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
−4609%
4050−4100
+4609%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−4577%
4350−4400
+4577%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−4625%
5150−5200
+4625%
Cyberpunk 2077 93
−4577%
4350−4400
+4577%
Far Cry 5 163
−4624%
7700−7750
+4624%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−4622%
8500−8550
+4622%
Hitman 3 100−110
−4620%
5050−5100
+4620%
Horizon Zero Dawn 255
−4625%
12050−12100
+4625%
Metro Exodus 132
−4597%
6200−6250
+4597%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 294
−4611%
13850−13900
+4611%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
−4604%
6350−6400
+4604%
Watch Dogs: Legion 103
−4609%
4850−4900
+4609%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−4603%
5550−5600
+4603%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−4616%
4150−4200
+4616%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−4610%
3250−3300
+4610%
Hitman 3 65−70
−4592%
3050−3100
+4592%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−4596%
5400−5450
+4596%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 99
−4597%
4650−4700
+4597%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 144
−4622%
6800−6850
+4622%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
−4577%
2900−2950
+4577%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
−4555%
2700−2750
+4555%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−4612%
2450−2500
+4612%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−4574%
2150−2200
+4574%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−4600%
2350−2400
+4600%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−4597%
6200−6250
+4597%
Horizon Zero Dawn 154
−4608%
7250−7300
+4608%
Metro Exodus 118
−4603%
5550−5600
+4603%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65
−4592%
3050−3100
+4592%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−4595%
3850−3900
+4595%

This is how GTS 250 and RX 6950 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6950 XT is 5250% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6950 XT is 6650% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6950 XT is 8500% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 73.26
Recency 4 March 2009 10 May 2022
Cost $199 $1099
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 335 Watt

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 250 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
GeForce GTS 250
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
Radeon RX 6950 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1587 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2618 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.