GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs GTS 250

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 250 and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTS 250
2009
1 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
1.55

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms GTS 250 by a whopping 4908% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking9298
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0533.15
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameG92BAD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 March 2009 (15 years ago)17 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $699
Current price$131 (0.7x MSRP)$719 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 SUPER has 66200% better value for money than GTS 250.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1287168
CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed738 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors754 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt220 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate47.2 billion/sec584.6
Floating-point performance387.1 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm)285 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors6-pin1x 16-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.04.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 250 1.55
RTX 4070 SUPER 77.63
+4908%

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms GTS 250 by 4908% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTS 250 598
RTX 4070 SUPER 29975
+4913%

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms GTS 250 by 4913% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−5100%
208
+5100%
1440p2−3
−6700%
136
+6700%
4K1−2
−8200%
83
+8200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
−4900%
6150−6200
+4900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
−4900%
6950−7000
+4900%
Battlefield 5 240−250
−4900%
12200−12250
+4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−4900%
6000−6050
+4900%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−4900%
5900−5950
+4900%
Far Cry New Dawn 190−200
−4900%
9700−9750
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−4900%
11900−11950
+4900%
Hitman 3 120−130
−4900%
6150−6200
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
−4900%
16400−16450
+4900%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−4900%
7350−7400
+4900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−4900%
6200−6250
+4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 434
−4900%
21700−21750
+4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 169
−4900%
8450−8500
+4900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
−4900%
6150−6200
+4900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
−4900%
6950−7000
+4900%
Battlefield 5 240−250
−4900%
12200−12250
+4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−4900%
6000−6050
+4900%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−4900%
5900−5950
+4900%
Far Cry New Dawn 190−200
−4900%
9700−9750
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−4900%
11900−11950
+4900%
Hitman 3 120−130
−4900%
6150−6200
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
−4900%
16400−16450
+4900%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−4900%
7350−7400
+4900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−4900%
6200−6250
+4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 428
−4900%
21400−21450
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 412
−4900%
20600−20650
+4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−4900%
7050−7100
+4900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
−4900%
6150−6200
+4900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
−4900%
6950−7000
+4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
−4900%
6000−6050
+4900%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−4900%
5900−5950
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−4900%
11900−11950
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
−4900%
16400−16450
+4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 381
−4900%
19050−19100
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 201
−4900%
10050−10100
+4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 139
−4900%
6950−7000
+4900%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−4900%
6200−6250
+4900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
−4900%
8300−8350
+4900%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−4900%
7200−7250
+4900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
−4900%
4600−4650
+4900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−105
−4900%
5000−5050
+4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−4900%
5550−5600
+4900%
Far Cry 5 183
−4900%
9150−9200
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−4900%
9800−9850
+4900%
Hitman 3 110−120
−4900%
5700−5750
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
−4900%
10300−10350
+4900%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−4900%
6200−6250
+4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 265
−4900%
13250−13300
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
−4900%
7700−7750
+4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 108
−4900%
5400−5450
+4900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−4900%
6100−6150
+4900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−4900%
4400−4450
+4900%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−4900%
3450−3500
+4900%
Hitman 3 70−75
−4900%
3500−3550
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−4900%
6250−6300
+4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 94
−4900%
4700−4750
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 133
−4900%
6650−6700
+4900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
−4900%
3350−3400
+4900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−4900%
3200−3250
+4900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−4900%
2600−2650
+4900%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−4900%
2500−2550
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−4900%
7350−7400
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−4900%
6250−6300
+4900%
Metro Exodus 95−100
−4900%
4750−4800
+4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
−4900%
3100−3150
+4900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−4900%
4500−4550
+4900%

This is how GTS 250 and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 5100% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 6700% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 8200% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 77.63
Recency 4 March 2009 17 January 2024
Cost $199 $699
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 220 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 250 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
GeForce GTS 250
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1591 vote

Rate GeForce GTS 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1899 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.