Radeon Pro 580 vs GeForce GT 755M

Place in the ranking	671	279
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.08	9.27
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GK107	Polaris 20
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	25 June 2013 (11 years ago)	5 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2304
Core clock speed	980 MHz	1100 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	31.36	172.8
Floating-point processing power	0.7526 TFLOPS	5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	32	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1350 MHz	1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	217.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 755M 4.41

Pro 580 20.17
+357%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 755M 1694

Pro 580 7753
+358%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GT 755M 4935

Pro 580 37915
+668%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

GT 755M 4226

Pro 580 43947
+940%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	56 −346%	250−260 +346%
Full HD	22 −355%	100−110 +355%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −347%	85−90 +347%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Valorant	10−12 −355%	50−55 +355%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Dota 2	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −355%	100−105 +355%
Fortnite	24−27 −323%	110−120 +323%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −347%	85−90 +347%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −347%	170−180 +347%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −333%	65−70 +333%
Valorant	10−12 −355%	50−55 +355%
World of Tanks	70−75 −311%	300−310 +311%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Dota 2	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −355%	100−105 +355%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −347%	85−90 +347%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −347%	170−180 +347%
Valorant	10−12 −355%	50−55 +355%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −333%	130−140 +333%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
World of Tanks	30−35 −352%	140−150 +352%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −338%	140−150 +338%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Valorant	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −338%	70−75 +338%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −338%	70−75 +338%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −338%	70−75 +338%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Dota 2	16−18 −338%	70−75 +338%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Fortnite	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Valorant	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%

This is how GT 755M and Pro 580 compete in popular games:

Pro 580 is 346% faster in 900p
Pro 580 is 355% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.41	20.17
Recency	25 June 2013	5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	150 Watt

GT 755M has 200% lower power consumption.

Pro 580, on the other hand, has a 357.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 580 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.