GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs GT 755M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 755M and GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 755M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
4.23

RTX 5090 Mobile outperforms GT 755M by a whopping 1570% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking67818
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.0753.35
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGK107GB203
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date25 June 2013 (11 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38410496
Core clock speed980 MHz990 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1515 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate31.36496.9
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPS31.8 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs32328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Coresno data82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s811.5 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA+10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 755M 4.23
RTX 5090 Mobile 70.62
+1570%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 755M 1694
RTX 5090 Mobile 28280
+1569%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p56
−1507%
900−950
+1507%
Full HD22
−1491%
350−400
+1491%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−1515%
210−220
+1515%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−1543%
230−240
+1543%
Valorant 10−12
−1536%
180−190
+1536%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−1515%
210−220
+1515%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Dota 2 14−16
−1543%
230−240
+1543%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−1491%
350−400
+1491%
Fortnite 24−27
−1438%
400−450
+1438%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1543%
230−240
+1543%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−1479%
600−650
+1479%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−1543%
230−240
+1543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1567%
250−260
+1567%
Valorant 10−12
−1536%
180−190
+1536%
World of Tanks 70−75
−1522%
1200−1250
+1522%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−1515%
210−220
+1515%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Dota 2 14−16
−1543%
230−240
+1543%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−1491%
350−400
+1491%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−1479%
600−650
+1479%
Valorant 10−12
−1536%
180−190
+1536%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−1452%
450−500
+1452%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
World of Tanks 30−35
−1513%
500−550
+1513%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1471%
110−120
+1471%
Valorant 12−14
−1515%
210−220
+1515%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−1547%
280−290
+1547%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1525%
260−270
+1525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1525%
260−270
+1525%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Dota 2 16−18
−1547%
280−290
+1547%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Fortnite 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Valorant 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%

This is how GT 755M and RTX 5090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 Mobile is 1507% faster in 900p
  • RTX 5090 Mobile is 1491% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.23 70.62
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 95 Watt

GT 755M has 90% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1569.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GeForce GT 755M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 79 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 60 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M or GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.