RTX 3070 Mobile vs GT 755M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GT 755M
4.36

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms GT 755M by 750% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking627119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.84no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN14P-GN20-E5 GA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date25 June 2013 (10 years old)4 January 2021 (3 years old)
Current price$310 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845120
Core clock speed980 MHz780 - 1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1290 - 1620 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate31.36287.0
Floating-point performance752.6 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 755M and GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
SLI-ready-no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5400 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 755M 4.36
RTX 3070 Mobile 37.07
+750%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms GT 755M by 750% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 755M 1691
RTX 3070 Mobile 14364
+749%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms GT 755M by 749% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 755M 12711
RTX 3070 Mobile 77148
+507%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms GT 755M by 507% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 755M 2801
RTX 3070 Mobile 33996
+1114%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms GT 755M by 1114% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 755M 2106
RTX 3070 Mobile 25478
+1110%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms GT 755M by 1110% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 755M 14967
RTX 3070 Mobile 136558
+812%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms GT 755M by 812% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p56
−704%
450−500
+704%
Full HD22
−432%
117
+432%
1440p9−10
−756%
77
+756%
4K5−6
−880%
49
+880%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1388%
119
+1388%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−738%
65−70
+738%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−2933%
91
+2933%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−808%
100−110
+808%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−573%
100−110
+573%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1238%
107
+1238%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1222%
119
+1222%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−1144%
112
+1144%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1354%
189
+1354%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1544%
148
+1544%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1063%
93
+1063%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1250%
108
+1250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1067%
140
+1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−1680%
89
+1680%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−738%
65−70
+738%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−2433%
76
+2433%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1017%
134
+1017%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−573%
100−110
+573%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1000%
88
+1000%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1167%
114
+1167%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−1100%
108
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1346%
188
+1346%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1433%
138
+1433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−950%
84
+950%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1517%
97
+1517%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−725%
66
+725%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−908%
121
+908%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1789%
170
+1789%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−1400%
75
+1400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−738%
65−70
+738%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−2167%
68
+2167%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−950%
126
+950%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−825%
74
+825%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1089%
107
+1089%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−967%
96
+967%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1185%
167
+1185%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−944%
94
+944%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−1100%
60
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1125%
98
+1125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−473%
63
+473%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1867%
59
+1867%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1800%
38
+1800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1171%
89
+1171%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2250%
47
+2250%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1200%
91
+1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2933%
91
+2933%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2700%
140
+2700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1200%
50−55
+1200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Hitman 3 4−5
−825%
35−40
+825%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−113%
17
+113%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1100%
24
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−4700%
48
+4700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 64

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1550%
33
+1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 22
Far Cry 5 5−6
−920%
51
+920%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−729%
58
+729%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4550%
93
+4550%

This is how GT 755M and RTX 3070 Mobile compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 704% faster than GT 755M

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 432% faster than GT 755M

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 756% faster than GT 755M

4K resolution:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 880% faster than GT 755M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3070 Mobile is 4700% faster than the GT 755M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3070 Mobile surpassed GT 755M in all 60 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.36 37.07
Recency 25 June 2013 4 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 125 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GeForce GT 755M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 69 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1579 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.