GeForce GT 1010 vs GT 755M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 640M GT 640M Mac Edition GT 645M GT 650M GT 650M Mac Edition GT 730M GT 745M GT 750M GT 750M Mac Edition GT 755M GT 755M Mac Edition GTX 660M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 1010 GT 1010 DDR4 GT 1030 GT 1030 DDR4 GT 1030 GK107

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 755M with GeForce GT 1010, including specs and performance data.

GT 755M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
4.41
+41.3%

GT 755M outperforms GT 1010 by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GT 755M GT 755M
GT 1010 GT 1010

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking673762
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.097.18
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK107GP108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date25 June 2013 (11 years ago)13 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384256
Core clock speed980 MHz1228 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1468 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate31.3623.49
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPS0.7516 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data147 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s40.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 755M 4.41
+41.3%
GT 1010 3.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 755M 1706
+41.2%
GT 1010 1208

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p56
+60%
35−40
−60%
Full HD22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Fortnite 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Valorant 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+48%
50−55
−48%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Dota 2 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Fortnite 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Valorant 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Dota 2 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Valorant 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Valorant 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Valorant 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how GT 755M and GT 1010 compete in popular games:

  • GT 755M is 60% faster in 900p
  • GT 755M is 57% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.41 3.12
Recency 25 June 2013 13 January 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 30 Watt

GT 755M has a 41.3% higher aggregate performance score.

GT 1010, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 755M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 1010 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M is a notebook card while GeForce GT 1010 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GeForce GT 755M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
GeForce GT 1010
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
vs
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
GT 1010 GeForce GT 1010
vs
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
vs
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
M1000M Quadro M1000M
vs
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
K3100M Quadro K3100M
vs
GT 720 OEM GeForce GT 720 OEM
Quadro 5010M Quadro 5010M
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
HD 7870M Radeon HD 7870M
vs
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Iris Xe Graphics MAX
K2100M Quadro K2100M
vs
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Iris Pro Graphics 6200
vs
GT 635M GeForce GT 635M
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
vs
Jetson Xavier NX 8 GB Jetson Xavier NX 8 GB
K1100M Quadro K1100M
vs
GMA X4500 GMA X4500
W4190M FirePro W4190M
vs
R7 M260 Radeon R7 M260
GT 650M GeForce GT 650M
vs
RTX 2050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 79 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 534 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M or GeForce GT 1010, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.