GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs GT 755M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 640M GT 640M Mac Edition GT 645M GT 650M GT 650M Mac Edition GT 730M GT 745M GT 750M GT 750M Mac Edition GT 755M GTX 660M GTX 660M Mac Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8200M G 8200M G mGPU AMD 8200M G mGPU Intel 8400M G 8400M GS 8400M GT 8600M GS 8600M GT 8600M GT Mac Edition 8600M GT SLI 8700M GT 8700M GT SLI 8800M GTS 8800M GTX 8800M GTX SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 755M and GeForce 8800M GTX SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 755M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
4.08
+118%

755M outperforms 8800M SLI by a whopping 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 755M GT 755M
8800M GTX SLI 8800M GTX SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking722942
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.331.12
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameGK107NB8E-GTX
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date25 June 2013 (12 years ago)19 November 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed980 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate31.36no data
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API10
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 755M 4.08
+118%
8800M GTX SLI 1.87

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 755M 12711
+101%
8800M GTX SLI 6326

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p56
+133%
24−27
−133%
Full HD22
+120%
10−12
−120%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Fortnite 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Valorant 55−60
+47.4%
35−40
−47.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+89.7%
35−40
−89.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Dota 2 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Fortnite 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Valorant 55−60
+47.4%
35−40
−47.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Dota 2 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Valorant 55−60
+47.4%
35−40
−47.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+146%
12−14
−146%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+73.7%
18−20
−73.7%
Valorant 40−45
+238%
12−14
−238%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how GT 755M and 8800M GTX SLI compete in popular games:

  • GT 755M is 133% faster in 900p
  • GT 755M is 120% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GT 755M is 467% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GT 755M surpassed 8800M GTX SLI in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.08 1.87
Recency 25 June 2013 19 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 130 Watt

GT 755M has a 118.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 755M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GeForce GT 755M
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
vs
GTX 760M GeForce GTX 760M
8800M GTX SLI GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
vs
R8 M445DX Radeon R8 M445DX
GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
vs
GTX 670M GeForce GTX 670M
GTX 570M 570M
vs
RTX 4060 AD106 4060 AD106
FirePro M5100 M5100
vs
HD 8950 OEM HD 8950 OEM
FirePro M5100 M5100
vs
UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake)
K2100M K2100M
vs
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT
K2100M K2100M
vs
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
GT 755M GT 755M
vs
HD 6470M HD 6470M
GT 755M GT 755M
vs
ATI 9250 PCI 9250 PCI
GT 755M GT 755M
vs
RX 6600 RX 6600
GTX 660M GTX 660M
vs
ATI 9250 PCI 9250 PCI
GTX 660M GTX 660M
vs
GeForce G105M G105M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 96 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M or GeForce 8800M GTX SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.