Radeon RX 560X vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GT 755M SLI
2013
2x 2048 MB GDDR5
8.65
+4.7%

GeForce GT 755M SLI outperforms Radeon RX 560X by a small 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking461471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.060.75
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameN14P-?Polaris 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2013 (10 years ago)11 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price$545 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 755M SLI has 175% better value for money than RX 560X.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Core clock speed980 MHz1175 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1275 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data81.60
Floating-point performanceno data2,611 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon RX 560X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5400 MHz7000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkanno data1.2.131
CUDA+no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+20%
30−35
−20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Hitman 3 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Hitman 3 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how GT 755M SLI and RX 560X compete in popular games:

  • GT 755M SLI is 20% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.65 8.26
Recency 1 November 2013 11 April 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 75 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon RX 560X.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon RX 560X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
AMD Radeon RX 560X
Radeon RX 560X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 377 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.