HD Graphics 2000 vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 755M SLI and HD Graphics 2000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 755M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB GDDR5, 2 Watt
7.91
+1482%

GT 755M SLI outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 1482% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5381263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.03no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameN14P-?Sandy Bridge GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)1 February 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76848
Core clock speed980 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Wattunknown
Texture fill rateno data8.100
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1296 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2x 128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5400 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 755M SLI 7.91
+1482%
HD Graphics 2000 0.50

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 755M SLI 20627
+2203%
HD Graphics 2000 896

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+227%
11
−227%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Sons of the Forest 14−16 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Fortnite 45−50
+1533%
3−4
−1533%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+263%
8−9
−263%
Sons of the Forest 14−16 0−1
Valorant 80−85
+204%
27−30
−204%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+641%
16−18
−641%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Dota 2 60−65
+455%
10−12
−455%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Fortnite 45−50
+1533%
3−4
−1533%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Metro Exodus 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+263%
8−9
−263%
Sons of the Forest 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Valorant 80−85
+204%
27−30
−204%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Dota 2 60−65
+455%
10−12
−455%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+263%
8−9
−263%
Sons of the Forest 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Valorant 80−85
+204%
27−30
−204%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+1533%
3−4
−1533%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+6100%
1−2
−6100%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12 0−1
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+760%
5−6
−760%
Valorant 90−95
+1740%
5−6
−1740%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Sons of the Forest 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Sons of the Forest 5−6 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

This is how GT 755M SLI and HD Graphics 2000 compete in popular games:

  • GT 755M SLI is 227% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 755M SLI is 6100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GT 755M SLI surpassed HD Graphics 2000 in all 26 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.91 0.50
Recency 1 November 2013 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

GT 755M SLI has a 1482% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 1422 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M SLI or HD Graphics 2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.