HD Graphics 2000 vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 755M SLI with HD Graphics 2000, including specs and performance data.

GT 755M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB GDDR5, 2 Watt
8.70
+1482%

GT 755M SLI outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 1482% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4871208
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.04no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameN14P-?Sandy Bridge GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76848
Core clock speed980 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Wattunknown
Texture fill rateno data8.100
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1296 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2x 128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5400 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 755M SLI 8.70
+1482%
HD Graphics 2000 0.55

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 755M SLI 20627
+2203%
HD Graphics 2000 896

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+218%
11
−218%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Battlefield 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1833%
3−4
−1833%
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+513%
8−9
−513%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Battlefield 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1833%
3−4
−1833%
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+513%
8−9
−513%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1833%
3−4
−1833%
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+513%
8−9
−513%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Hitman 3 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

This is how GT 755M SLI and HD Graphics 2000 compete in popular games:

  • GT 755M SLI is 218% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GT 755M SLI is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GT 755M SLI surpassed HD Graphics 2000 in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.70 0.55
Recency 1 November 2013 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

GT 755M SLI has a 1481.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook card while HD Graphics 2000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 1266 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.