GeForce GTX 470M SLI vs GT 755M SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 755M SLI and GeForce GTX 470M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 755M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB GDDR5, 2 Watt
8.70
+30.8%

GT 755M SLI outperforms GTX 470M SLI by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking495568
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.99no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameN14P-?N11E-GT
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)1 November 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768576
Core clock speed980 MHz535 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Wattno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GBno data
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed5400 MHz1250 MHz
Shared memory--

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 755M SLI 8.70
+30.8%
GTX 470M SLI 6.65

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 755M SLI 5673
+39.4%
GTX 470M SLI 4070

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 755M SLI 20627
+22.8%
GTX 470M SLI 16802

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p85−90
+28.8%
66
−28.8%
Full HD36
−108%
75
+108%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Elden Ring 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+35.3%
16−18
−35.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Valorant 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Dota 2 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Elden Ring 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Fortnite 50−55
+30.8%
35−40
−30.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+35.3%
16−18
−35.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+25.9%
50−55
−25.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Valorant 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
World of Tanks 120−130
+24%
100−110
−24%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Dota 2 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+25.9%
50−55
−25.9%
Valorant 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Elden Ring 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+10.5%
35−40
−10.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
World of Tanks 60−65
+31.3%
45−50
−31.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Valorant 21−24
+29.4%
16−18
−29.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Elden Ring 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Fortnite 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Valorant 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

This is how GT 755M SLI and GTX 470M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GT 755M SLI is 29% faster in 900p
  • GTX 470M SLI is 108% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GT 755M SLI is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 755M SLI is ahead in 60 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.70 6.65
Recency 1 November 2013 1 November 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

GT 755M SLI has a 30.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 470M SLI in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
GeForce GTX 470M SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 470M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.