FirePro S9150 vs GeForce GT 745A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking744not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.72no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGK107Hawaii
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 August 2013 (11 years ago)7 August 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842816
Core clock speed837 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed915 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,270 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt235 Watt
Texture fill rate29.28158.4
Floating-point processing power0.7027 TFLOPS5.069 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32176

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s320 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 August 2013 7 August 2014
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 235 Watt

GT 745A has 612.1% lower power consumption.

FirePro S9150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 745A and FirePro S9150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 745A is a notebook card while FirePro S9150 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A
GeForce GT 745A
AMD FirePro S9150
FirePro S9150

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce GT 745A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 12 votes

Rate FirePro S9150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.