GRID A100A vs GeForce GT 740A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking927not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.65no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK208GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 August 2013 (11 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846912
Core clock speed980 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1005 MHz
Number of transistors915 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate31.36434.2
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPS13.89 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs32432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit6144 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s1,866 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA3.58.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 August 2013 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 400 Watt

GT 740A has 1112.1% lower power consumption.

GRID A100A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 740A and GRID A100A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 740A is a notebook card while GRID A100A is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A
GeForce GT 740A
NVIDIA GRID A100A
GRID A100A

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 740A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.