Radeon R5 220 OEM vs GeForce GT 735M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 934 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 3.52 | no data |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | GK208 | Cedar |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 April 2013 (11 years ago) | 21 December 2013 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 80 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 650 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 889 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 915 million | 292 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 19 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 5.200 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.4416 TFLOPS | 0.104 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 8 | 4 |
TMUs | 32 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 168 mm |
Width | no data | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | no data |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 8.528 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | no data |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | no data |
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | no data |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | no data |
HDMI | + | + |
HDCP content protection | + | - |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | - |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | - |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | - |
Optimus | + | - |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 April 2013 | 21 December 2013 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 19 Watt |
GT 735M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
R5 220 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 73.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 735M and Radeon R5 220 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GT 735M is a notebook card while Radeon R5 220 OEM is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.