Radeon RX 6800M vs GeForce GT 730 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated149
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.41
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 April 2015 (9 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842560
Core clock speed902 MHz2116 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2390 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)64 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate28.86382.4
Floating-point processing power0.6927 TFLOPS12.24 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs32160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 April 2015 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 64 Watt 145 Watt

GT 730 OEM has 126.6% lower power consumption.

RX 6800M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 730 OEM and Radeon RX 6800M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 730 OEM is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 OEM
GeForce GT 730 OEM
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 88 votes

Rate GeForce GT 730 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 302 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.