UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce GT 720M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 720M with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.

GT 720M
2013
2 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
1.19

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms GT 720M by a whopping 279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1075671
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.4620.59
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGK208Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date25 December 2013 (11 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192256
Core clock speed719 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors915 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate12.1320.80
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Standard memory configurationDDR3no data
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 2560x1600no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 2560x1600no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 720M 1.19
UHD Graphics 750 4.51
+279%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 720M 456
UHD Graphics 750 1733
+280%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−257%
50−55
+257%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Atomic Heart 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Atomic Heart 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Battlefield 5 0−1 16−18
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Fortnite 13
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6
−183%
16−18
+183%
Valorant 30−35
−69.7%
55−60
+69.7%
Atomic Heart 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Battlefield 5 0−1 16−18
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−185%
70−75
+185%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Dota 2 21
−257%
75−80
+257%
Fortnite 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
−133%
14−16
+133%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−140%
12−14
+140%
Valorant 30−35
−69.7%
55−60
+69.7%
Battlefield 5 0−1 16−18
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Dota 2 18
−261%
65−70
+261%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Valorant 30−35
−69.7%
55−60
+69.7%
Fortnite 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Valorant 3−4
−1433%
45−50
+1433%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Fortnite 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Atomic Heart 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GT 720M and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is 257% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 1433% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 43 tests (78%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 4.51
Recency 25 December 2013 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has a 279% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 720M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 720M is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
GeForce GT 720M
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1
1013 votes

Rate GeForce GT 720M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6
407 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 720M or UHD Graphics 750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.