Radeon RX 6900 vs GeForce GT 720M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GT 720M with Radeon RX 6900, including specs and performance data.
RX 6900 outperforms GT 720M by a whopping 5825% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1088 | 30 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.42 | 18.57 |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | GK208 | Navi 21 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 December 2013 (11 years ago) | 28 October 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 4608 |
| Core clock speed | 719 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | 2105 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 915 million | 23,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 255 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 12.13 | 606.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.2911 TFLOPS | 19.4 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 64 |
| TMUs | 16 | 288 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 16 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | no data |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | no data |
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | no data |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | no data |
| HDMI | + | + |
| HDCP content protection | + | - |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | - |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | - |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | - |
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 14
−5614%
| 800−850
+5614%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−5400%
|
110−120
+5400%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−5700%
|
290−300
+5700%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−5400%
|
110−120
+5400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 13
−5669%
|
750−800
+5669%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−5733%
|
350−400
+5733%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−5700%
|
290−300
+5700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6
−5733%
|
350−400
+5733%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−5681%
|
1850−1900
+5681%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 24−27
−5669%
|
1500−1550
+5669%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−5400%
|
110−120
+5400%
|
| Dota 2 | 21
−5614%
|
1200−1250
+5614%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 2−3
−5400%
|
110−120
+5400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−5733%
|
350−400
+5733%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6
−5733%
|
350−400
+5733%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−5700%
|
290−300
+5700%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−5400%
|
55−60
+5400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−5456%
|
500−550
+5456%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5
−5700%
|
290−300
+5700%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−5681%
|
1850−1900
+5681%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−5400%
|
110−120
+5400%
|
| Dota 2 | 18
−5733%
|
1050−1100
+5733%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−5733%
|
350−400
+5733%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−5700%
|
290−300
+5700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−5456%
|
500−550
+5456%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−5733%
|
350−400
+5733%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−5681%
|
1850−1900
+5681%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−5400%
|
110−120
+5400%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 6−7
−5733%
|
350−400
+5733%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−5809%
|
650−700
+5809%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−5400%
|
110−120
+5400%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−5400%
|
55−60
+5400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−5650%
|
230−240
+5650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−5567%
|
170−180
+5567%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
−5400%
|
55−60
+5400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−5400%
|
110−120
+5400%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−5400%
|
110−120
+5400%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−5567%
|
850−900
+5567%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−5733%
|
350−400
+5733%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−5567%
|
170−180
+5567%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−5400%
|
110−120
+5400%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−5400%
|
110−120
+5400%
|
This is how GT 720M and RX 6900 compete in popular games:
- RX 6900 is 5614% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.01 | 59.84 |
| Recency | 25 December 2013 | 28 October 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 255 Watt |
GT 720M has 672.7% lower power consumption.
RX 6900, on the other hand, has a 5824.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 6900 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 720M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GT 720M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
