GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GT 720M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 720M and GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 720M
2013
2 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
1.06

GT 755M Mac Edition outperforms GT 720M by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1118906
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.453.05
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK208GK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date25 December 2013 (11 years ago)8 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed719 MHz1085 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHzno data
Number of transistors915 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate12.1334.72
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS0.8333 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Standard memory configurationDDR3no data
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 2560x1600no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 2560x1600no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Fortnite 13
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Valorant 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 21
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 6
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−80%
9−10
+80%
Valorant 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 18
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Valorant 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
Valorant 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

This is how GT 720M and GT 755M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • GT 755M Mac Edition is 71% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.06 2.00
Recency 25 December 2013 8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 50 Watt

GT 720M has an age advantage of 1 month, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 51.5% lower power consumption.

GT 755M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 88.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 720M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
GeForce GT 720M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1085 votes

Rate GeForce GT 720M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 720M or GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.