Radeon HD 5450 vs GeForce GT 720

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	917	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.02	no data
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	GK208B	Cedar
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	29 September 2014 (9 years ago)	4 February 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$49	no data
Current price	$394 (8x MSRP)	$205

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	80
CUDA cores	192	no data
Core clock speed	797 MHz	650 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	98 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	12.75	5.200
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	104 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	170 mm
Height	2.713" (6.9 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3 / GDDR5	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB or 1 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1.8 GBps or 5.0 GB/s	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5)	6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Multi monitor support	3 displays	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	29 September 2014	4 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB or 1 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---