GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs GT 710M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 710M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 710M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.12

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 710M by a whopping 1669% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1082281
Place by popularitynot in top-10082
Power efficiency5.2427.82
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF117TU116
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2013 (12 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961024
Core clock speed775 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors585 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate12.4095.04
Floating-point processing power0.2976 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA2.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 710M 1.12
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 19.81
+1669%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 710M 440
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+1672%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−1933%
61
+1933%
1440p2−3
−2200%
46
+2200%
4K1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 76
+0%
76
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 56
+0%
56
+0%
Battlefield 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Fortnite 121
+0%
121
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 181
+0%
181
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 34
+0%
34
+0%
Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Dota 2 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 38
+0%
38
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 180
+0%
180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+0%
69
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 164
+0%
164
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 41
+0%
41
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%
Valorant 84
+0%
84
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 13
+0%
13
+0%

This is how GT 710M and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1933% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2200% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2600% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 19.81
Recency 9 January 2013 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

GT 710M has 233.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1668.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
GeForce GT 710M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 227 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1737 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 710M or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.