GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs GT 625M

Place in the ranking	1043	274
Place by popularity	not in top-100	62
Power efficiency	5.69	27.92
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF117	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 October 2012 (12 years ago)	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	1024
Core clock speed	Up to 625 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.00	95.04
Floating-point processing power	0.24 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	32
TMUs	16	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 14.4 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	-
Optimus	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 625M 1.24

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.28
+1535%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 625M 478

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+1531%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 625M 921

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+1340%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −1867%	59 +1867%
1440p	2−3 −2050%	43 +2050%
4K	1−2 −2400%	25 +2400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −367%	42 +367%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1867%	59 +1867%
Elden Ring	0−1	57

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −5800%	59 +5800%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −300%	36 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1233%	40 +1233%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1088%	95 +1088%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −633%	44 +633%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −6300%	60−65 +6300%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −967%	32 +967%
Dota 2	1−2 −8900%	90 +8900%
Elden Ring	0−1	73
Far Cry 5	10−11 −600%	70 +600%
Fortnite	5−6 −2040%	100−110 +2040%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −838%	75 +838%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −7500%	76 +7500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −871%	130−140 +871%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −383%	29 +383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −814%	60−65 +814%
World of Tanks	27−30 −763%	230−240 +763%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −5100%	52 +5100%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −300%	35−40 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −867%	29 +867%
Dota 2	1−2 −11100%	112 +11100%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −570%	65−70 +570%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −688%	63 +688%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −871%	130−140 +871%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2357%	170−180 +2357%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	17
World of Tanks	7−8 −1857%	130−140 +1857%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −700%	16 +700%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
Valorant	6−7 −767%	50−55 +767%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −113%	30−35 +113%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −127%	30−35 +127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −1933%	60−65 +1933%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −127%	30−35 +127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −2100%	22 +2100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6 +500%
Dota 2	16−18 −225%	52 +225%
Far Cry 5	0−1	24−27
Valorant	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus	66 +0%	66 +0%
Valorant	98 +0%	98 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Metro Exodus	45 +0%	45 +0%
Valorant	48 +0%	48 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant

80−85

+0%

80−85

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	41 +0%	41 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Fortnite	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

This is how GT 625M and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1867% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2050% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 11100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 41 test (71%)
there's a draw in 17 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.24	20.28
Recency	1 October 2012	23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt

GT 625M has 233.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1535.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 625M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.