Radeon RX 6300M vs GeForce GT 640M LE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
615 GT 415M GT 420M GT 425M GT 435M GT 520M GT 525M GT 540M GT 550M GT 620M GT 630M GT 640M LE
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300M 6450M 6500 6500M 6550M 6550S 6600M 6600S 6650M 6650M XT 6700M 6700S 6800M 6800S 6850M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640M LE and Radeon RX 6300M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 640M LE
2012, $850
2 GB DDR3\DDR5, 20 Watt
1.65

6300M outperforms 640M LE by a whopping 830% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 640M LE GT 640M LE
RX 6300M RX 6300M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking993381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency3.9733.77
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF108Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 May 2012 (14 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$849.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresUp to 384768
Core clock speedUp to 500 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors585 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate12.05115.2
Floating-point processing power0.289 TFLOPS3.686 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs1648
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\DDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed785 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 28.8 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 640M LE 1.65
RX 6300M 15.35
+830%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 640M LE 689
Samples: 374
RX 6300M 6421
+832%
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p19
−795%
170−180
+795%
Full HD21
−805%
190−200
+805%

Cost per frame, $

1080p40.48no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−8700%
85−90
+8700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2
−3200%
30−35
+3200%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2133%
65−70
+2133%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−8700%
85−90
+8700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1175%
50−55
+1175%
Fortnite 6−7
−1350%
85−90
+1350%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−1533%
45−50
+1533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−480%
55−60
+480%
Valorant 35−40
−253%
120−130
+253%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2133%
65−70
+2133%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−8700%
85−90
+8700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−486%
200−210
+486%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Dota 2 18−20
−411%
95−100
+411%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1175%
50−55
+1175%
Fortnite 6−7
−1350%
85−90
+1350%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−1533%
45−50
+1533%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−2850%
55−60
+2850%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−480%
55−60
+480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Valorant 35−40
−253%
120−130
+253%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2133%
65−70
+2133%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Dota 2 18−20
−411%
95−100
+411%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1175%
50−55
+1175%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−480%
55−60
+480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Valorant 35−40
−253%
120−130
+253%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−1350%
85−90
+1350%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−945%
110−120
+945%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−794%
150−160
+794%
Valorant 9−10
−1644%
150−160
+1644%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Valorant 8−9
−988%
85−90
+988%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4
−1767%
55−60
+1767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how GT 640M LE and RX 6300M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6300M is 795% faster in 900p
  • RX 6300M is 805% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6300M is 8700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6300M performs better in 49 tests (82%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (18%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.65 15.35
Recency 4 May 2012 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 35 Watt

GT 640M LE has 75% lower power consumption.

RX 6300M, on the other hand, has a 830% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 567% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6300M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640M LE in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
vs
R6 (Kaveri) Radeon R6 (Kaveri)
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
vs
HD 6630M Radeon HD 6630M
GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
vs
6700 XL GeForce 6700 XL
GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
vs
GeForce2 Go GeForce2 Go
GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
vs
HD 6970 X2 HD 6970 X2
GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
vs
R5 A220 R5 A220
GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
vs
Apple M1 GPU M1 GPU
GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
vs
RX 6950 XT RX 6950 XT
GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
vs
RTX 3050 OEM RTX 3050 OEM
GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
vs
RX 6750 GRE RX 6750 GRE
GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
vs
Arc B580 Arc B580
R6 (Kaveri) Radeon R6 (Kaveri)
vs
HD Graphics 505 Graphics 505

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 64 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640M LE or Radeon RX 6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.