Aubrey Isle vs GeForce GT 640

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking765not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.20no data
Power efficiency3.27no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Knights (2010)
GPU code nameGK107Knights Ferry
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 June 2012 (12 years ago)31 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384256
Core clock speed902 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million2,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate28.8638.40
Floating-point processing power0.6927 TFLOPS0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s307.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2012 31 May 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 300 Watt

GT 640 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 361.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640 and Aubrey Isle. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640 is a desktop card while Aubrey Isle is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
GeForce GT 640
Intel Aubrey Isle
Aubrey Isle

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1542 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Aubrey Isle on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.