Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
610 610 OEM 610 PCI 610 PCIe x1 620 620 OEM 625 OEM 630 630 OEM 630 Rev. 2 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 635 OEM 640 640 OEM 640 OEM Rebrand 640 Rev. 2 645 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4000 4000 Mac Edition 5000 5000 SDI 6000 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070-Q Tesla S2050

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 with Tesla C2070, including specs and performance data.

GT 640 Rev. 2
2013, $89
1 GB GDDR5, 49 Watt
3.30

C2070 outperforms 640 Rev. 2 by a whopping 126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
Tesla C2070 Tesla C2070

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking787576
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency5.172.41
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK208GF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 May 2013 (12 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384448
Core clock speed1046 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors915 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt238 Watt
Texture fill rate33.4732.14
Floating-point processing power0.8033 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs3256
L1 Cache32 KB896 KB
L2 Cache128 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm248 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz747 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.06 GB/s143.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DVI
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.52.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.30 7.46
Recency 29 May 2013 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 238 Watt

GT 640 Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 385.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla C2070, on the other hand, has a 126.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Tesla C2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla C2070 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Tesla C2070
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 4870 Radeon HD 4870
Tesla C2070 Tesla C2070
vs
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GTS 450 GeForce GTS 450
GT 630 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
vs
HD 7410M Radeon HD 7410M
GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
vs
ATI HD 2350 PRO Radeon HD 2350 PRO
GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
vs
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
vs
RTX A4500 Max-Q RTX A4500 Max-Q
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
HD 7490M Radeon HD 7490M
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GT 415 OEM GeForce GT 415 OEM
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GT 1030 DDR4 GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
GTX 645 OEM GeForce GTX 645 OEM
vs
ATI HD 5870 Eyefinity 6 Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity 6

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 35 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla C2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 or Tesla C2070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.