ATI Radeon X1300 PRO vs GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

GT 610 GT 610 PCI GT 620 GT 625 OEM GT 630 GT 630 OEM GT 635 OEM GT 640 GT 640 OEM GT 640 OEM Rebrand GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 645 OEM
VS
Radeon X1300 Radeon X1300 AGP Radeon X1300 CE Radeon X1300 LE Radeon X1300 PCI Radeon X1300 PRO Radeon X1300 PRO AGP Radeon X1300 XT Radeon X1300 XT AGP Radeon X1600 Radeon X1600 PRO Radeon X1950 PRO

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and Radeon X1300 PRO, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 640 Rev. 2
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 49 Watt
3.55
+1514%

GT 640 Rev. 2 outperforms ATI X1300 PRO by a whopping 1514% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
ATI X1300 PRO X1300 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7221373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency5.050.50
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGK208RV515
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 May 2013 (11 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1046 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors915 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate33.472.400
Floating-point processing power0.8033 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.06 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.55 0.22
Recency 29 May 2013 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 31 Watt

GT 640 Rev. 2 has a 1513.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1300 PRO, on the other hand, has 58.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1300 PRO in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
Radeon X1300 PRO
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 4870 Radeon HD 4870
ATI X1300 PRO Radeon X1300 PRO
vs
GeForce 6600 GeForce 6600
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
Radeon 540 Radeon 540
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 3450 Radeon HD 3450
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X1600 PRO Radeon X1600 PRO
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X1600 XT Radeon X1600 XT
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X1550 Radeon X1550
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X1800 GTO Radeon X1800 GTO
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X800 SE Radeon X800 SE
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X700 Radeon X700
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI 9600 PRO Radeon 9600 PRO
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI 9600 XT Radeon 9600 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 27 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 33 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.