Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
610 610 OEM 610 PCI 610 PCIe x1 620 620 OEM 625 OEM 630 630 OEM 630 Rev. 2 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 635 OEM 640 640 OEM 640 OEM Rebrand 640 Rev. 2 645 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Instinct MI25 Pro V320 Pro V320 MxGPU Pro V340 Pro V340 8 GB Pro V340 16 GB Pro V340 MxGPU Pro WX 8100 Pro WX 8200 PRO WX 9100 Vega Frontier Edition Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 with Radeon Pro WX 8200, including specs and performance data.

GT 640 Rev. 2
2013, $89
1 GB GDDR5, 49 Watt
3.29

Pro 8200 outperforms 640 Rev. 2 by a whopping 815% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
Pro WX 8200 Pro WX 8200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking793211
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.197.65
Power efficiency5.1710.08
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK208Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 May 2013 (12 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Pro WX 8200 has 3926% better value for money than GT 640 Rev. 2.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843584
Core clock speed1046 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors915 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate33.47336.0
Floating-point processing power0.8033 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs32224
L1 Cache32 KB896 KB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.06 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.125
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.29 30.11
Recency 29 May 2013 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 230 Watt

GT 640 Rev. 2 has 369% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 8200, on the other hand, has a 815% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GTS 450 GeForce GTS 450
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GT 740 GeForce GT 740
GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
vs
Arc 7 A770M 7 A770M
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
Tesla C2070 Tesla C2070
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI Graphics Ultra Pro Ultra Pro
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI Graphics Wonder VLB Graphics Wonder VLB
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
Pro WX 9200 Pro WX 9200
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
W7170M FirePro W7170M
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
FirePro M6100 FirePro M6100
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
9800M GTX SLI GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
9800M GTS SLI GeForce 9800M GTS SLI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 36 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 29 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 or Radeon Pro WX 8200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.