Radeon HD 6250 vs GeForce GT 635M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	945	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.26	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	N13E-GE2	Zacate
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 December 2011 (12 years ago)	16 November 2010 (13 years ago)
Current price	$55	$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	144	80
CUDA cores	Up to 144	no data
Core clock speed	Up to 675 MHz	280 MHz
Boost clock speed	753 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,170 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	19 Watt
Texture fill rate	Up to 16.2 billion/sec	5.200
Floating-point performance	253.4 gflops	104 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 635M and Radeon HD 6250 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	Up to 192bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 43.2 GB/s	8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	6 December 2011	16 November 2010
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	19 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---