Tesla S2050 vs GeForce GT 630
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 924 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.08 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.88 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | GF108 | GF100 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) | 25 July 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | $11,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 585 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 900 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 12.96 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.311 TFLOPS | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 48 |
| TMUs | 16 | 56 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 773 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 148.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 May 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 900 Watt |
GT 630 has an age advantage of 9 months, and 1284.6% lower power consumption.
Tesla S2050, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 630 and Tesla S2050. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GT 630 is a desktop card while Tesla S2050 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
