Radeon RX Vega 7 vs GeForce GT 630

Place in performance ranking	886	501
Place by popularity	96	10
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.08	10.96
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code name	GF108	Vega Raven Ridge
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)	7 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$99.99	no data
Current price	$112 (1.1x MSRP)	$387

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 7 has 13600% better value for money than GT 630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	448
Core clock speed	810 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1800 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.96	no data
Floating-point performance	311.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 630 and Radeon RX Vega 7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	no data
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	no data
CUDA	2.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 630 1.75

RX Vega 7 7.43
+325%

Radeon RX Vega 7 outperforms GeForce GT 630 by 325% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 630 810

RX Vega 7 3348
+313%

Radeon RX Vega 7 outperforms GeForce GT 630 by 313% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.