GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs GT 630

Place in the ranking	922	181
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.08	no data
Power efficiency	1.88	18.45
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF108	TU106
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)	29 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$99.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	1920
Core clock speed	810 MHz	960 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.96	144.0
Floating-point processing power	0.311 TFLOPS	4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	48
TMUs	16	120
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 630 1.75

RTX 2060 Mobile 30.44
+1639%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 630 810

RTX 2060 Mobile 16331
+1916%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	5−6 −1940%	102 +1940%
1440p	3−4 −2000%	63 +2000%
4K	2−3 −1850%	39 +1850%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	20.00	no data
1440p	33.33	no data
4K	50.00	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

45−50

+0%

45−50

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	91 +0%	91 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	71 +0%	71 +0%
Battlefield 5	119 +0%	119 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	88 +0%	88 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Far Cry 5	105 +0%	105 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	110 +0%	110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	366 +0%	366 +0%
Hitman 3	83 +0%	83 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	223 +0%	223 +0%
Metro Exodus	130 +0%	130 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100 +0%	100 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	148 +0%	148 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	227 +0%	227 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	107 +0%	107 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	56 +0%	56 +0%
Battlefield 5	105 +0%	105 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	79 +0%	79 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Far Cry 5	85 +0%	85 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	82 +0%	82 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	280 +0%	280 +0%
Hitman 3	75 +0%	75 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	196 +0%	196 +0%
Metro Exodus	112 +0%	112 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75 +0%	75 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	123 +0%	123 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190 +0%	190 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50 +0%	50 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	48 +0%	48 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	58 +0%	58 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Far Cry 5	62 +0%	62 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	88 +0%	88 +0%
Hitman 3	66 +0%	66 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	94 +0%	94 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	107 +0%	107 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60 +0%	60 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	38 +0%	38 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65 +0%	65 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	54 +0%	54 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +0%	40 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +0%	38 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	42 +0%	42 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Far Cry 5	42 +0%	42 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	246 +0%	246 +0%
Hitman 3	46 +0%	46 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70 +0%	70 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	210 +0%	210 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	32 +0%	32 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	30 +0%	30 +0%
Hitman 3	28 +0%	28 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	86 +0%	86 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 +0%	39 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 +0%	25 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	22 +0%	22 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20 +0%	20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry 5	21 +0%	21 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	15 +0%	15 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

This is how GT 630 and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is 1940% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 2000% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 1850% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.75	30.44
Recency	15 May 2012	29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	115 Watt

GT 630 has 76.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1639.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 630 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.