FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated766
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.39
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK208RV770
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 May 2013 (11 years ago)16 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384800
Core clock speed902 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors915 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate28.8625.00
Floating-point processing power0.6927 TFLOPS1 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length115 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz993 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s63.55 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DVI
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 May 2013 16 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 150 Watt

GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 and FireStream 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 is a desktop card while FireStream 9250 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 17 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.