GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs GT 625M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
620M 710A 720A 720M 800M 810M 820A 820M GT 625M GT 710M GT 720A GT 820M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 640M GT 640M Mac Edition GT 645M GT 650M GT 650M Mac Edition GT 730M GT 745M GT 750M GT 750M Mac Edition GT 755M GTX 660M GTX 660M Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 625M and GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 625M
2012
2 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.16

660M Mac Edition outperforms 625M by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 625M GT 625M
GTX 660M Mac Edition GTX 660M Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11021020
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.942.26
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGF117GK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2012 (13 years ago)1 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speedUp to 625 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors585 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate10.0030.40
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs1632
L1 Cache128 KB32 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 14.4 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Valorant 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Valorant 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Valorant 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Valorant 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Valorant 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.16 1.47
Recency 1 October 2012 1 April 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

GT 625M has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 660M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 26.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 months.

The GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 625M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GeForce GT 625M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 625M GeForce GT 625M
vs
R5 M315 Radeon R5 M315
GTX 660M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
vs
R7 A360 Radeon R7 A360
GT 625M GeForce GT 625M
vs
GeForce 820M GeForce 820M
Quadro K510M Quadro K510M
vs
GT 630 Rev. 2 GT 630 Rev. 2
HD 7650M Radeon HD 7650M
vs
9600 GT Rev. 2 GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2
HD 7570M Radeon HD 7570M
vs
RX 6950 XT RX 6950 XT
HD 7630M Radeon HD 7630M
vs
HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
HD 7630M Radeon HD 7630M
vs
HD 7350 OEM PCI HD 7350 OEM PCI
GT 620M GeForce GT 620M
vs
GeForce 620M GeForce 620M
GT 620M GeForce GT 620M
vs
ATI HD 3450 HD 3450
GT 525M GeForce GT 525M
vs
Tesla S2050 Tesla S2050
GT 525M GeForce GT 525M
vs
HD 8400E HD 8400E
GT 525M GeForce GT 525M
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 38 votes

Rate GeForce GT 625M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 625M or GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.