GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs 710A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 710A and GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 710A
2013
2 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
1.10

GTX 660M Mac Edition outperforms 710A by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10911010
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.682.24
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGF117GK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2013 (12 years ago)1 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speed775 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors585 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate12.4030.40
Floating-point processing power0.2976 TFLOPS0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1632
L1 Cache128 KB32 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA2.13.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.10 1.39
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 710A has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 51.5% lower power consumption.

GTX 660M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 26.4% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 710A in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 710A
GeForce 710A
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 22 votes

Rate GeForce 710A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 710A or GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.