RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce GT 625 OEM

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 625 OEM with RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GT 625 OEM
2013
1 GB DDR3, 29 Watt
1.05

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 625 OEM by a whopping 4369% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking113881
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.7836.04
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF119AD104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date18 February 2013 (12 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores485120
Core clock speed874 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors292 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate6.992247.2
Floating-point processing power0.1678 TFLOPS15.82 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cache64 KB5 MB
L2 Cache128 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed825 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth13.2 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMIPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 625 OEM 1.05
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 46.92
+4369%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 625 OEM 439
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 19623
+4370%
Samples: 623

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.05 46.92
Recency 18 February 2013 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 100 Watt

GT 625 OEM has 244.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4368.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 625 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 625 OEM is a desktop graphics card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
GeForce GT 625 OEM
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 62 votes

Rate GeForce GT 625 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 45 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 625 OEM or RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.