Radeon Graphics vs GeForce GT 620M

Place in the ranking	1082	902
Place by popularity	not in top-100	8
Power efficiency	5.19	9.13
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF108	Renoir
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	23 August 2012 (12 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	448
Core clock speed	Up to 625 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	715 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.56	42.00
Floating-point processing power	0.2534 TFLOPS	1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	8
TMUs	16	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	Up to 128bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	Up to 28.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	-
Optimus	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 620M 1.13

Radeon Graphics 1.99
+76.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 620M 434

Radeon Graphics 764
+76%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−75%

70−75
+75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Dota 2	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Fortnite	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
World of Tanks	24−27 −60%	40−45 +60%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Dota 2	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Valorant	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%