HD Graphics vs GeForce GT 620M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1039not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10094
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 7.0 (2012)
GPU code nameN13P-GLP / N13M-GSIvy Bridge GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price$300 $286

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9648
CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speedUp to 625 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed715 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors585 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateUp to 10.0 billion/sec6.300
Floating-point performance253.4 gflops15.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 620M and HD Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthUp to 128bitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidthUp to 28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.54.0
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 620M 436
+205%
HD Graphics 143

GeForce GT 620M outperforms HD Graphics by 205% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 620M 738
+146%
HD Graphics 300

GeForce GT 620M outperforms HD Graphics by 146% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 40 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 620M and HD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 620M is a notebook card while HD Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GeForce GT 620M
Intel HD Graphics
HD Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 397 votes

Rate GeForce GT 620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 1819 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.