Radeon RX 5800 XT vs GeForce GT 545

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking782not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.33no data
Power efficiency2.84no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF116Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 May 2011 (13 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1443328
Core clock speed720 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1775 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate17.28369.2
Floating-point processing power0.4147 TFLOPS11.81 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 275 Watt

GT 545 has 292.9% lower power consumption.

RX 5800 XT, on the other hand, has a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 545 and Radeon RX 5800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
GeForce GT 545
AMD Radeon RX 5800 XT
Radeon RX 5800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 85 votes

Rate GeForce GT 545 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 203 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.