UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs GeForce GT 540M

Place in the ranking	1041	855
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.43	15.48
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code name	GF108	Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	5 January 2011 (13 years ago)	11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	24
Core clock speed	672 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	800 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.75	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.258 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	4	no data
TMUs	16	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	-
3D Gaming	+	-
Optimus	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 540M 1.24

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 2.26
+82.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 540M 888

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1458
+64.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 540M 760

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1106
+45.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	16 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Full HD	20 +42.9%	14 −42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−66.7%

5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Hitman 3	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −35.7%	18−20 +35.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −9.1%	35−40 +9.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Hitman 3	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −35.7%	18−20 +35.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −18.2%	12−14 +18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −9.1%	35−40 +9.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Hitman 3	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −35.7%	18−20 +35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +175%	4 −175%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −9.1%	35−40 +9.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−150%

5−6
+150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	1−2
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Hitman 3	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	1−2
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−25%

5−6
+25%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Watch Dogs: Legion

0−1

This is how GT 540M and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 69% faster in 900p
GT 540M is 43% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 540M is 175% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GT 540M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is ahead in 42 tests (86%)
there's a draw in 6 tests (12%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.24	2.26
Recency	5 January 2011	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has a 82.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 540M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.