RTX A1000 Mobile vs GeForce GT 520M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 520M with RTX A1000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GT 520M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.74

RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms GT 520M by a whopping 3258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1162224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency4.2528.51
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF108GA107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed600 MHz630 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1140 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80072.96
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 520M 0.74
RTX A1000 Mobile 24.85
+3258%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 520M 286
RTX A1000 Mobile 9552
+3240%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 520M 502
RTX A1000 Mobile 15135
+2915%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 520M 2280
RTX A1000 Mobile 58312
+2458%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p8
−3150%
260−270
+3150%
Full HD12
−458%
67
+458%
1200p7
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
1440p0−127

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−633%
66
+633%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1933%
61
+1933%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−456%
50
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−733%
25
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1457%
109
+1457%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−980%
50−55
+980%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−367%
42
+367%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18
+500%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−825%
74
+825%
Fortnite 2−3
−6150%
120−130
+6150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1143%
87
+1143%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1460%
150−160
+1460%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−980%
50−55
+980%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1250%
80−85
+1250%
World of Tanks 18−20
−1253%
250−260
+1253%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−289%
35
+289%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−400%
15
+400%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−850%
75−80
+850%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−986%
76
+986%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1460%
150−160
+1460%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−4275%
170−180
+4275%
World of Tanks 3−4
−5367%
160−170
+5367%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1700%
70−75
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Valorant 5−6
−1240%
65−70
+1240%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−187%
40−45
+187%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−187%
40−45
+187%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−3700%
75−80
+3700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−187%
40−45
+187%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Dota 2 14−16
−187%
40−45
+187%
Valorant 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring 60
+0%
60
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Elden Ring 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 91
+0%
91
+0%
Metro Exodus 16
+0%
16
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Elden Ring 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Elden Ring 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how GT 520M and RTX A1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A1000 Mobile is 3150% faster in 900p
  • RTX A1000 Mobile is 458% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A1000 Mobile is 3186% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A1000 Mobile is 6150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A1000 Mobile is ahead in 35 tests (56%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 24.85
Recency 5 January 2011 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 60 Watt

GT 520M has 400% lower power consumption.

RTX A1000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3258.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 520M is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GeForce GT 520M
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A1000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 417 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 88 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.