Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce GT 520M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 520M with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GT 520M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.67
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
24.56
+3566%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 520M by a whopping 3566% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1228256
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency4.3254.34
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF108AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)26 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed600 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2025 MHz
Number of transistors585 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800129.6
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache64 KB2 MB
L2 Cache128 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 520M 0.67
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 24.56
+3566%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 520M 502
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20464
+3976%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 520M 2280
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+2808%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p7
−3471%
250−260
+3471%
Full HD12
−3233%
400−450
+3233%
1200p7
−3471%
250−260
+3471%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−3525%
290−300
+3525%
Valorant 27−30
−3521%
1050−1100
+3521%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−3400%
700−750
+3400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
Dota 2 12−14
−3233%
400−450
+3233%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−3525%
290−300
+3525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Valorant 27−30
−3521%
1050−1100
+3521%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
Dota 2 12−14
−3233%
400−450
+3233%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−3525%
290−300
+3525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3500%
180−190
+3500%
Valorant 27−30
−3521%
1050−1100
+3521%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−3471%
250−260
+3471%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−3471%
500−550
+3471%
Valorant 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%

This is how GT 520M and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 3471% faster in 900p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 3233% faster in 1080p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 3471% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 24.56
Recency 5 January 2011 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

GT 520M has 191.7% lower power consumption.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3565.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 520M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GeForce GT 520M
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 462 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 43 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 520M or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.