Radeon E6460 vs GeForce GT 520

Place in performance ranking	1103	1100
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.01	0.01
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	GF119	Caicos
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	13 April 2011 (13 years ago)	7 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$59	no data
Current price	$88 (1.5x MSRP)	$150

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 520 and Radeon E6460 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	160
CUDA cores	48	no data
Core clock speed	810 MHz	600 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	370 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	29 Watt	25 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	102 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	6.5 billion/sec	4.800
Floating-point performance	155.52 gflops	192 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	no data
Height	2.7" (6.9 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB (DDR3)	512 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz (DDR3)	3200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional)	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.2	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 520 0.80

Radeon E6460 0.83
+3.7%

Radeon E6460 outperforms GeForce GT 520 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 520 309

Radeon E6460 323
+4.5%

Radeon E6460 outperforms GeForce GT 520 by 5% in Passmark.